Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
From lawbrain.com
The Humanitarian Law Project case involved peace and human rights activists who sought an injunction permitting them to train militant terrorist groups to use international law in resolving disputes. Although this ruling infringed upon the activists' First Amendment liberties, the Supreme Court held in a 6 - 3 decision that the U.S. government has a compelling interest in preventing terrorism.
- This LawBrain entry is about a current or emerging court case. You can update the article with new information and sources. Click the 'Edit' tab above to add to this page.
Contents |
Overview
On June 21, 2010, the Supreme Court held that federal statute's prohibitions on "expert advice," "training," "service," and "personnel" were not vague, and did not violate speech or associational rights as applied by plaintiffs' intended activities. At issue in this case is the constitutionality of the "material support" statute, 18 U.S.C.§ 2339b. The term "material support" means "any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who may be or include oneself), and transportation... ."[1]
Although the court acknowledged that these freedoms are fundamental rights protected by the first amendment, the state satisfied strict scrutiny by having a compelling interest in denying support to terrorist groups. The Court reasoned that providing such support would be congruent to promoting illegal activity.[2] Therefore, statutory limitations of such support meet constitutional muster.
References
- ↑ http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2009/2008_08_1498
- ↑ http://ccrjustice.org/holder-v-humanitarian-law-project
External Links
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
- Justices to review Patriot Act provision
- What might the Court's decision in Holder v. HLP mean for future federal constraints on attorney advice?
- Humanitarian Group Challenges Antiterror Law at Supreme Court
Related Resources on FindLaw
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (opinion)
- Talking to Terrorists: The Worst U.S. Supreme Court Decision of the Term
Related Blogs on FindLaw
- Constitutional Challenge to Terrorist Support Law Rejected ...
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498, concerned a constitutional challenge to 18 U.S.C. section 2339B(a)(1), which prohibits... - Civil Rights Law [?]
- The Supreme Court To Evaluate a Portion of the Patriot Act ...
- The case, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project asks the Court to define that part ... The Humanitarian Project is challenging the law saying as peace workers, they ... [?]
- No Material Support: USSC Says this Includes Your Speech ...
- and Humanitarian Law Project, et al., v. Holder. These are the only "war on terror" cases the Court will decide this term and the decision is a momentous one. ... [?]
- U.S. Supreme Court: Civil Rights Law Archives
- Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498, concerned a constitutional challenge to 18 U.S.C. section ... Full Text of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, No. 08-1498 ... [?]
- Hernandez v. Holder, No. 08-2455 - Immigration Law - U.S. ...
- Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming a denial of a Guatemalan... - Immigration Law [?]
Web Services by Yahoo!
See Also
Contributors
