What is LawBrain?
It's a living legal community making laws accessible and interactive. Click Here to get Started »

Ontario vs. Quon

From lawbrain.com

The Ontario Police Department searched a pager issued to Jeff Quon, an employee of the department, for text messages that contained sexually explicit messages not related to work. The Supreme Court held that such a search was reasonable and non-violative of the Fourth Amendment. (City of Ontario v. Quon, slip opinion No. 08-1332).

Contents

Overview

This case involves Sgt. Jeff Quon, a former police officer with the Ontario, CA Police Department.  The Deprtment reviewed his usage of a department issued pager discovering "sexting."  Essentially the case, being heard by  the US Supreme Court in 2010 revolves around determing what are the privacy expectations on company owned devices as different from within the confines of workplace environment where precedent does not offer much in the way of privacy expectations.

Procedural Facts

Facts

Legal Analysis and Conclusion

Effects of the Law

References

External Links

Related Resources on FindLaw

Related Blogs on FindLaw

Failed to load RSS feed from http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/rss/webSearch.xml?appid=yahoosearchwebrss&query=text+message+privacy%20site:blogs.findlaw.com!

                                                                            Web Services by Yahoo!

See Also

Contributors

FindLaw John, FindLaw Michelle, FindLaw Sarah, FindLaw dave, Pddooley