What is LawBrain?
It's a living legal community making laws accessible and interactive. Click Here to get Started »

Difference between revisions of "Net neutrality"

From lawbrain.com

 
Line 1: Line 1:
Net neutrality is primarily concerned with the transmission of data over digital service lines ("DSL") or broadband networks.
+
Net neutrality is primarily concerned with the transmission of data over digital service lines ("DSL") or broadband networks.  
  
{{Stub}} <br>
+
{{Stub}} <br>  
  
 
== History of Net Neutrality  ==
 
== History of Net Neutrality  ==
  
For most internet users in the United States, DSL and broadband are the most common technology used by internet service providers ("ISP"). Some of the largest ISPs in the United States are America Online, Comcast, SBC Communication, Verizon and many others.
+
For most internet users in the United States, DSL and broadband are the most common technology used by internet service providers ("ISP"). Some of the largest ISPs in the United States are America Online, Comcast, SBC Communication, Verizon and many others.  
  
ISPs typically give you the option of purchasing a DSL, broadband, or cable internet connection by paying a flat monthly fee. Originally, ISPs only needed to charge a monthly fee because the content generated on the internet was easily viewed by its users. However, as the quality of data becomes more sophisticated, users are demanding more advanced technological services to meet their normal internet needs.
+
ISPs typically give you the option of purchasing a DSL, broadband, or cable internet connection by paying a flat monthly fee. Originally, ISPs only needed to charge a monthly fee because the content generated on the internet was easily viewed by its users. However, as the quality of data becomes more sophisticated, users are demanding more advanced technological services to meet their normal internet needs.  
  
 
This new demand has led to a general discussion favoring a tiered pricing system rather than a flat monthly fee. Such a system would compensate ISPs for giving some users special access to internet content, while users who cannot afford the additional billing would not have access to the same data.  
 
This new demand has led to a general discussion favoring a tiered pricing system rather than a flat monthly fee. Such a system would compensate ISPs for giving some users special access to internet content, while users who cannot afford the additional billing would not have access to the same data.  
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== Net Neutrality Opponents  ==
 
== Net Neutrality Opponents  ==
  
Proponents of a tiered system want the new fees to recoup the costs of meeting consumer demands. As user activity burgeons,&nbsp; ISPs will need to invest more money in technological upgrades.
+
Proponents of a tiered system want the new fees to recoup the costs of meeting consumer demands. As user activity burgeons,&nbsp; ISPs will need to invest more money in technological upgrades.  
  
 
== Net Neutrality Supporters  ==
 
== Net Neutrality Supporters  ==
  
Since the internet's inception, every site has been giving equal treatment by ISPs thereby enabling various organizations to share their information freely. Supporters are concerned that a tiered pricing system would result in telecom companies censoring internet content.
+
Since the internet's inception, every site has been giving equal treatment by ISPs thereby enabling various organizations to share their information freely. Supporters are concerned that a tiered pricing system would result in telecom companies censoring internet content.  
  
 
The [[Federal Communications Commission]] has come out in support of rules that would prevent filtering or blocking of Internet content, which is in line with President [[Barack Obama]]'s pledge to support net neutrality principles. However, on April 6, 2010 in [http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201004/08-1291-1238302.pdf Comcast v. FCC] the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overruled the [[Federal Communications Commission|Federal Communications Commission]] and decided to allow Comcast and other ISPs to restrict consumer's ability to access certain kinds of internet content.  
 
The [[Federal Communications Commission]] has come out in support of rules that would prevent filtering or blocking of Internet content, which is in line with President [[Barack Obama]]'s pledge to support net neutrality principles. However, on April 6, 2010 in [http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201004/08-1291-1238302.pdf Comcast v. FCC] the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overruled the [[Federal Communications Commission|Federal Communications Commission]] and decided to allow Comcast and other ISPs to restrict consumer's ability to access certain kinds of internet content.  
Line 23: Line 23:
 
== Developments  ==
 
== Developments  ==
  
On May 6, 2010, the Chairman of the [[Federal Communications Commission|Federal Communications Commission]], Julius Genachowski, issued a prepared statement warning against the adverse impacts of the Comcast deicision. Chairman Genachowski stressed the importance of ensuring a solid legal foundation for protecting consumers, promoting innovation and job creation, and fostering a world-leading broadband infrastructure for all Americans.<ref>http://www.broadband.gov/the-third-way-narrowly-tailored-broadband-framework-chairman-julius-genachowski.html</ref> <br>
+
On May 6, 2010, the Chairman of the [[Federal Communications Commission|Federal Communications Commission]], Julius Genachowski, issued a prepared statement warning against the adverse impacts of the Comcast deicision. Chairman Genachowski stressed the importance of ensuring a solid legal foundation for protecting consumers, promoting innovation and job creation, and fostering a world-leading broadband infrastructure for all Americans.<ref>http://www.broadband.gov/the-third-way-narrowly-tailored-broadband-framework-chairman-julius-genachowski.html</ref> <br>  
  
 
== References  ==
 
== References  ==
  
<references />
+
<references />  
  
 +
== External Links<br>  ==
  
== Related Blogs on FindLaw ==
+
*[http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/neutrality.html Moyers on America: Net Neutrality]<br>
 +
*[http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08242007/neutrality.html Bill Moyers Journal: Net Neutrality Update]
 +
*[http://www.educause.edu/node/645/tid/31666?time=1280186097 Educause: Net Neutrality]
 +
*[http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/3G/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=224201539 Comcast Beats FCC In Net Neutrality Battle]
  
<rss>http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/rss/webSearch.xml?appid=yahoosearchwebrss&query=net+neutrality%20site:blogs.findlaw.com|max=5</rss> <br> <!-- Begin Yahoo Web Services HTML Attribution Snippet -->&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [http://www.developer.yahoo.com Web Services by Yahoo!] <!-- End Yahoo Web Services HTML Attribution Snippet -->
+
== Related Blogs on FindLaw  ==
  
[[Category:Cyberlaw]]
+
<rss>http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/rss/webSearch.xml?appid=yahoosearchwebrss&query=net+neutrality%20site:blogs.findlaw.com|max=5</rss> <br> <!-- Begin Yahoo Web Services HTML Attribution Snippet -->&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [http://www.developer.yahoo.com Web Services by Yahoo!] <!-- End Yahoo Web Services HTML Attribution Snippet -->
[[Category:Technology]]
+
 
[[Category:Telecommunications Law]]
+
[[Category:Cyberlaw]] [[Category:Technology]] [[Category:Telecommunications_Law]] [[Category:Internet_Law]]
[[Category:Internet Law]]
+
 
 +
<br>

Latest revision as of 23:19, 26 July 2010

Net neutrality is primarily concerned with the transmission of data over digital service lines ("DSL") or broadband networks.

  • This LawBrain entry is a stub. Please help us expand it! Click the 'Edit' tab above to add to this page.

Contents

History of Net Neutrality

For most internet users in the United States, DSL and broadband are the most common technology used by internet service providers ("ISP"). Some of the largest ISPs in the United States are America Online, Comcast, SBC Communication, Verizon and many others.

ISPs typically give you the option of purchasing a DSL, broadband, or cable internet connection by paying a flat monthly fee. Originally, ISPs only needed to charge a monthly fee because the content generated on the internet was easily viewed by its users. However, as the quality of data becomes more sophisticated, users are demanding more advanced technological services to meet their normal internet needs.

This new demand has led to a general discussion favoring a tiered pricing system rather than a flat monthly fee. Such a system would compensate ISPs for giving some users special access to internet content, while users who cannot afford the additional billing would not have access to the same data.

Net Neutrality Opponents

Proponents of a tiered system want the new fees to recoup the costs of meeting consumer demands. As user activity burgeons,  ISPs will need to invest more money in technological upgrades.

Net Neutrality Supporters

Since the internet's inception, every site has been giving equal treatment by ISPs thereby enabling various organizations to share their information freely. Supporters are concerned that a tiered pricing system would result in telecom companies censoring internet content.

The Federal Communications Commission has come out in support of rules that would prevent filtering or blocking of Internet content, which is in line with President Barack Obama's pledge to support net neutrality principles. However, on April 6, 2010 in Comcast v. FCC the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overruled the Federal Communications Commission and decided to allow Comcast and other ISPs to restrict consumer's ability to access certain kinds of internet content.

Developments

On May 6, 2010, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Julius Genachowski, issued a prepared statement warning against the adverse impacts of the Comcast deicision. Chairman Genachowski stressed the importance of ensuring a solid legal foundation for protecting consumers, promoting innovation and job creation, and fostering a world-leading broadband infrastructure for all Americans.[1]

References

  1. http://www.broadband.gov/the-third-way-narrowly-tailored-broadband-framework-chairman-julius-genachowski.html

External Links

Related Blogs on FindLaw

Failed to load RSS feed from http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/rss/webSearch.xml?appid=yahoosearchwebrss&query=net+neutrality%20site:blogs.findlaw.com!

                                                                            Web Services by Yahoo!


Contributors

FindLaw Communities, FindLaw Michelle, FindLaw Nira, FindLaw Sarah, FindLaw Support, FindLaw dave, Redheaded1