What is LawBrain?
It's a living legal community making laws accessible and interactive. Click Here to get Started »

Difference between revisions of "Opinions:Perry v. Schwarzenegger"

From lawbrain.com

Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Opinion}}  
 
{{Opinion}}  
  
== Should Prop. 8 Have Been Overturned?  ==
+
=== Should Prop. 8 Have Been Overturned?  ===
  
 
Judge Vaughn Walker's decision on Aug. 4, 2010, found Prop 8 unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. The judge concluded that "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license."  
 
Judge Vaughn Walker's decision on Aug. 4, 2010, found Prop 8 unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. The judge concluded that "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license."  

Revision as of 00:35, 5 August 2010

Should Prop. 8 Have Been Overturned?

Judge Vaughn Walker's decision on Aug. 4, 2010, found Prop 8 unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. The judge concluded that "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license."

Share your thoughts on this decision below. Is Judge Walker's constitutional analysis correct?

--FindLaw Brian 00:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Contributors

Curious student, FindLaw Brian, FindLaw Nira, FindLaw Sarah