What is LawBrain?
It's a living legal community making laws accessible and interactive. Click Here to get Started »

Evans v. Pollock

From lawbrain.com

Evans v. Pollock, 796 S.W.2d 465 (Tex. 1990), is a property law case involving the subdivision of property with restrictive covenants for the purpose of furthering the owner’s general development scheme.

  • This LawBrain entry is about a case that is commonly studied in law school. You can find, contribute to, and create other common 1L, 2L, and 3L cases in the Law School Cases category. And you can use the Opinon tab above to discuss hypos. For more information on editing, visit the LawBrain edit help page.


Summary of Case Facts

A plot of land was subdivided into various tracts. These tracts were held by two owners who subdivided the tracts into smaller lots. The lots were placed up for sale with substantially the same restrictive covenants allowing only residential use and only one residence per lot. When one of the owners of the lots passed away, the lots passed to their devisees without the restrictive covenants. The devisees sold the property without the restrictions to Pollock who sought to build commercial businesses as well as a condominium development on those lots. Evans, an owner of a lot in the subdivision with the restrictive covenants recorded in his deed, sought to enforce the restrictive covenants against Pollock under the reciprocal negative easement doctrine.


To imply a reciprocal negative easement against a lot owner in a subdivision, must the restrictions apply to the entire subdivision?

Holding and Law

No. “We hold that the general plan or scheme may be that the restrictions only apply to certain well-defined similarly situated lots for the doctrine of implied reciprocal negative easements to apply as to such lots.”

Related Cases and Resources on LawBrain


FindLaw AHK, FindLaw John